Tuesday, November 30, 2010

THE LOWER INDUS RIVER

Earth Science Search Engine
THE LOWER INDUS RIVER: BALANCING DEVELOPMENT AND MAINTENANCE OF WETLAND ECOSYSTEMS AND DEPENDENT LIVELIHOODS
1. BACKGROUND
Study area: location and geography The Indus River originates at Lake Ngangla Rinco on the Tibetan Plateau and flows3,000 km through mountains, plains of the Thar Desert and deltaic ecosystems to the Arabian Sea. It is the primary source of water for Pakistan. The Indus Delta covers an area of some 5,000 km2, of which 2,000 km2 is a protected area. The fan-shaped Delta is the sixth largest in the world and supports a population of over 130,000 people, whose livelihoods are directly or indirectly dependent on the Indus River.

The water-resource developments
The expanding population, which is growing at a rate 3%, and the extremely low rainfall, has
meant that most areas in Pakistan cannot grow rain-fed crops. With a growing population, the
supply of irrigation water for food production is a top political priority, as is water for industrial and domestic use. Several storage dams and barrages (Box 1) have been built on the Indus River
and a complex network of canals transfers this water to about 30 million acres of agricultural
land. Some dams, e.g. Tarbela Dam, are also used to generate hydroelectric power.

Because of the development drive to meet human needs, decision-makers or water engineers in Pakistan have little experience of the value of aquatic ecosystems and the need for environmental flows. Most see the flow of water to the Delta as an unacceptable loss of water that should be used upstream for irrigated agriculture. Thus the accepted wisdom is to reduce
flows to the Delta. The need for an Environmental Flow Assessment (EFA) The amount of water in the Indus River has decreased dramatically from around 185,000 million m3 per annum in 1892 to 12,300 million m3 per annum in the 1990s (Box 2). The most recent flow was determined by way of the Indus Water Accord in 1994, whereby the allocation of water between the Provinces of Pakistan was decided. The Indus River Authority was established to implement the Accord.


CENTRAL INDUS PLATFORM BASIN


LOCATION
The Nurpur, Hetu, Khiu, Kuclachi, Layyah, Vehari and Sadiqabad Blocks are located in the Central
Indus Platform Basin and lies in the Punjab Province.

GEOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK
Central Indus Platform Basin (CIPB) rests on the continental margin of Indo-Pakistani Plate.
CIPB is bounded in south by Jaisalmer-Mari-Kandhkot High, while Sulaiman Range defines the western boundary. The Sargodha Ridge (Kirana Hills) markes the north-eastern boundary. The Punjab Platform dips westward into the Sulaiman Foredeep. The structural style of the Central Indus Platform Basin is obscured at surface by thick alluvial cover. Seismic and drilling studies reveal subsurface structural features related mainly to phases of Precambrian to Cambrian and Mesozoic extension but also to the effect of the peripheral collisional orogenies and consequent foreland basin deposition.

STRATIGRAPHY
CIPB was in a passive margin setting, while sediments were probably laid down under partly
restricted shallow marine conditions in interior rifts in intermittent connection with Tethys. Cambrian sediments are overlain unconformably by the Permian sequence. Shallow marine to paralic conditions prevailed throughout the area up to the Late Triassic. A thick succession of fine grained clastics was deposited in response to passive margin thermal subsidence during the
Early Jurassic. High global sea levels resulted in the establishment of a widespread carbonate platform over the area. The Middle Jurassic carbonate platform was replaced by shallow marine to deltaic shale and sandstones. During the Late Cretaceous carbonate platform replaced by a more clastic-dominated regime, relatively quiescent conditions on the passive margin in the
north resulted in the deposition of Late Eocene carbonates.
Throughout the Oligocene, the Indian Ocean coastline gradually migrated southwards, so that marine conditions were progressively replaced by continental conditions. By the Middle Miocene the collision between the Indian and Eurasian Plates had resulted in deposition of widespread molasse deposits.


PETROLEUM SYSTEM
The producing field (Nandpur and Panjpir) in the south-west indicate the presence of a valid petroleum system in the area.

SOURCE ROCKS

The Infra-Cambrian shale has been considered by many authors to be an excellent source rock, total organic carbon content (TOC) ranging from 3.75% to 30%. Datta and Shinawari Formations of Jurassic age show good to very good potential. Pyrolysis data indicate that the Datta
Formation in the Nandpur-1 well is at the beginning of the oil window. Sembar has TOC up to 2.84% of type II & III kerogen. Mughalkot shale has TOC in the range of 0.55 to 1.0 % of type III kerogen. Shale in Paleocene (Ranikot/Patala) has TOC up to 3.47 % of Type III kerogen. The shale of Sui Formation in Dhandi-1 and Sabzal-1 shows good source potential. Rubbly Limestone Formation has approximately 300 metres of good source rock in the Savi Ragha-1 well while Domanda Shale has TOC values ranging from 1.25% to 3.42% with HI values from 194 to 654 mgHC/gTOC. Oil generation and expulsion could be expected from these intervals if deeply buried.

RESERVOIR ROCKS
Expected reservoir targets include Jodhpur Sandstone and Bilara Dolomite of Infra-Cambrian,
Khewra, Kussak, Jutana and Baghanwala formations of Cambrian age and Tobra and Wargal
formations of Permian age. The carbonates sequence in Mesozoic, sandstone of Early Cretaceous
lower Goru/Sembar formations could also be possible reservoirs. Late Paleocene Dunghan Limestone and Early Paleocene sandstones of Ranikot Formation have good reservoirs characteristics.

SEAL ROCKS
Hanseran Evaporite of Salt Range Formation, marine mudstone (Kussak) and shallow marine
mudstones of Dandot Formation are potential seals. The shale in Chhidru Formation, shale within the Datta Formation and Patala/Ranikot shale are good seal for underlying reservoir. Ghazij shale (Eocene) is the regional seal in the area.

TRAPPING MECHANISM
Possible traps associated with the Infra-Cambrian and Cambrian rift phase include tilted, low relief fault blocks, although any such faults that exist appear to have low displacements. Reverse drag around normal faults has previously been ascribed to rollover, but the planar geometries of the faults in the Central Indus Platform Basin suggest the hanging-wall geometries are controlled by strain around faults. Normal fault-related structures appear to be the most common potential fault-related traps.Infra-Cambrian halite has undergone halokinesis in the Arabian Plate basins and there is some evidence for this in the Central Indus Platform Basin, where folding occurs in the surrounding beds, salt solution and withdrawal features on the Punjab Platform.
Potential stratigraphic traps occur, especially beneath the base Tertiary or base Miocene
unconformities. There is potential for sealing in fluvial shales of Murree Formation.